Overview
of Keynote talk (by Josh Schimel) at tonight’s RCN workshop banquet dinner
Q: Why do we want to add microbial mechanisms to biogeochemical models?
A: Because we really think they matter!
To incorporate enzymes into models, 2 conditions are required:
1) Soil organic matter is rate limiting
2) C product pools have alternate fates!
Currently, models are not able to accurately represent both rates and
magnitudes of changes in soil C dynamics!
Soil organic matter decomposition is dependent first on microbial
access constraints, and secondly on then allocations. Soil C decomposition
facilitated by biological factors is important to model at specific plant
rhizospheres, in the soil organic horizon, and (possibly) in dead roots. Soil C
decomposition modeling is not necessarily as useful with regard to fresh litter
C or the mineral fraction of the soil consistent with physically protected OM.
Three common mechanistic models include 1) Functional, 2) Guild, and 3)
Trait Based models. Today, there are
many tools to assess high resolution C pools (via IR and Mass spectrometry
techniques) and microbial community species assemblages (via 454
pyrosequencing). From one gram of soil from a single soil core, we can identify
thousands of different C structures and microbial species. However, these relationships
are impossibly difficult for us to discern because nature is too complex for
man to fully understand. There is much that we can learn by embracing
multidisciplinary fields such as Landscape Ecology, mathematics, and
biogeochemistry. The future in understanding these soil C relationships with
biology is to simplify using biogeochemical models.